Chain restaurants in downtown Bloomington

Mayor Kruzan has said that his proposal to make chain restaurants a “conditional use” that would need to be approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) is not a “ban” on chains. But if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck… you know how it goes. The purpose of this proposal is clearly to make it more difficult for chains to locate in downtown Bloomington. Given that there are already several chains downtown – Starbucks, Jimmy Johns, Subway and Chipotle – the BZA could conclude that any additional chains would upset the “balance” needed downtown.

After a few people argued in the public comments that the market should determine what restaurants should go downtown, Steve Volan childishly brought up the argument that no one should object to a chemical weapons incineration facility downtown. This is downright silly. It is several leaps from arguing that the market should decide which restaurants should be permitted to locate downtown to arguing for no restrictions on land use at all. Volan is far too intelligent to be making these arguments.

Obviously, there should be reasonable restrictions on land use, to protect the property rights and property values of neighbors. I do not know of anyone who is arguing for absolutely no land use restrictions. Going to an absurd extreme does not establish the case for making chain restaurants a “conditional use” downtown.

The other problem is that the Indiana state constitution makes it illegal for government to “grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.” A restaurant owner with a single location would not be subject to the same restriction as someone attempting to open a Jimmy John’s or a Burger King – or another Kilroy’s location, for that matter. The pseudo-ban would almost certainly be subject to a court challenge, and the city could very well lose.

It is true that downtown Bloomington has a unique character, and we do not necessarily want it to lose that character, but this clearly discriminatory pseudo-ban is not the way to go about protecting the downtown. The city council should reject Kruzan’s proposal.

One thought on “Chain restaurants in downtown Bloomington

  1. A bit of an outsider perspective, but I like how the Broad Ripple village in Indianapolis has handled chains. Several chains have existed in the heart of Broad Ripple, some for a long time. But the ones in the heart of Broad Ripple typically are different than the typical store.

    The Starbucks and CVS both lack a drive thru and are small. The Kroger lacks a pharmacy and is pretty much groceries and a few other items. The McDonald's has a drive-thru but it is on the edge of Broad Ripple and not in the heart of it.

    And that seems to be the attitude in lots of Indianapolis' communities, neighborhoods, and cultural centers. Chains are allowed, but you're probably not gonna get a Wal-Mart Super Center in there. A Wal-Mart Grocery Market? Maybe.

    Hell, this whole discussion may be a non-issue. How much downtown space in Bloomington is there actually available? I'd guess that any chain would have to be in existing spaces and wouldn't have much room to expand.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s