Hobby Lobby, FDA labels and entitlements

The Supreme Court’s decision in the Hobby Lobby case was hailed as a victory for religious freedom – and it was – but it is troubling that the case was decided on the basis of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act instead of on the First Amendment. Laws can always be superseded by more laws, but the Constitution is much more difficult to change.

There was one particularly troubling part of the majority opinion:

The owners of the businesses have religious objections to abortion, and according to their religious beliefs the four contraceptive methods at issue are abortifacients.

This is one of the worst aspects of modern society: The rejection of objective truth and the deference to subjective opinion. It is worrisome that this sort of nonsense has infected the “conservative” SCOTUS majority. The morning after pill and other birth control methods either act as abortifacients or they do not. It is simply irresponsible for the “conservative” majority to punt this question and make it a matter of “belief” rather than fact.

According to the website for the drug Plan B, it does act as an abortifacient:

It is possible that Plan B One-Step® may also work by preventing fertilization of an egg (the uniting of sperm with the egg) or by preventing attachment (implantation) to the uterus (womb).

See screenshots posted on Twitter and Photobucket.

One of the most common justifications for forcing employers to purchase birth control for employees is that the insurance policy is owned by the employee. This is true, but the policy (and what it covers) is constructed by the employer. Even within many companies, there are different levels of policy and what is covered. By the logic of “the employee owns the policy,” health insurance would be mandated to cover everything from elective cosmetic surgery to over-the-counter painkillers and cold medicine to sex-change operations. It is a silly argument.

The Hobby Lobby case is typical of our national entitlement mentality. “Waah! If someone else does not buy something for me, then I am denied access to that thing.” That may be the case for a two year old, but adults can always purchase the drugs they want with their own money. It would have been unthinkable fifty years ago that employers should be forced to pay for employees’ birth control, but our society has declined quite a bit since then.

3 thoughts on “Hobby Lobby, FDA labels and entitlements

  1. You may want to save the usual hysterical hyperbole for Round 2, when Muslim, Mormon, Christian Scientist, Jehovah's Witness, Scientologist and other employers with “deeply held beliefs” start imposing their crackpot ideas on employees. Need a blood transfusion? Not covered! Need any kind of medicine? Go home and pray for help! Don't like Shariah law? Too bad! The comic potential is unlimited. Enjoy!

    Like

  2. “One of the most common justifications for forcing employers to purchase birth control for employees is that the insurance policy is owned by the employee. “

    Exactly right. It's part of the compensation for their labor.

    “This is true, but the policy (and what it covers) is constructed by the employer.”

    As is their monetary salary. Employees don't set their own salaries, their employers do. But that doesn't give the employer the right to arbitrarily vary what they pay the employee, for the same amount of labor.

    “That may be the case for a two year old, but adults can always purchase the drugs they want with their own money. “

    You just made it clear, above, that it IS their own money. Their health insurance is part of their total compensation, along with their salary, their parking spot, discounted food in the company cafeteria, etc.

    “It would have been unthinkable fifty years ago that employers should be forced to pay for employees' birth control, but our society has declined quite a bit since then.”

    It would be interesting to have you enumerate how society has “declined” since the days when black people didn't have the right to eat in the same restaurants as white people. where women could not divorce men who were abusive, when it was illegal to marry someone just because they were not the same race as you.

    People enjoy freedoms, today, that would have been unthinkable fifty years ago — at least unthinkable to anyone who wasn't a white male.

    Like

  3. Let's begin by acknowledging the obvious: the ACA does not require ANY employer to provide health insurance for ANY employee. Walmart is a perfect case in point, along with the vast majority of restaurants, nearly all farms, etc. It DOES mandate that no discrimination is allowed IF insurance is provided. Why do self-righteous pseudo-Xians always demand the “right” to cherry-pick which rules they will or will not follow, from the Old Testament on down to the present day? This trait ranks as one of the most disturbing aspects of their cult.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s