“Cancel Culture” is a creation of the Left, designed to destroy the lives and careers of people who say offensive things – sometimes even for minor indiscretions. The case of Claira Janover proves that Cancel Culture also exists on the Right, with the idea that they are “fighting fire with fire.”
The problem is that “fighting fire with fire” eventually burns everyone on the battlefield. It only encourages escalation and retaliation, which leads to more from the other side. Worse yet, the Right’s embrace of Cancel Culture strengthens the radical Left’s arguments by embracing their tactics. Worse yet, the next time we oppose Cancel Culture from the Left, we will have damaged our credibility.
President Trump would be better off if he would stop fulminating on Twitter, and Twitter needs to learn the difference between an illegal threat and boringly normal discussions of public policy. Here is the President’s tweet that brought a rather silly moderation decision from Twitter:
Donald J. Trump
There will never be an “Autonomous Zone” in Washington, D.C., as long as I’m your President. If they try they will be met with serious force!
8:45 AM · Jun 23, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
Twitter is under increasing pressure from the Left to delete the President’s account, so they hid the tweet from public view and attached this warning:
This Tweet violated the Twitter Rules about abusive behavior. However, Twitter has determined that it may be in the public’s interest for the Tweet to remain accessible.
What is the point of hiding the tweet? Twitter brings more attention to the President’s tweets by doing this. Hiding the tweet actually amplifies the President’s message. Doing this accomplishes nothing, other than virtue signaling for Leftists in Silicon Valley, “woke” users on the platform and Twitter’s own employees.
Printed in the Herald-Times, July 3, 2020
To the Editor:
When undercover police officers were selling drugs on Isaac Singletary’s front lawn, he attempted to chase them off. The police then killed a citizen attempting to protect his property from what he thought were criminals. Kathryn Johnston thought she was about to be a victim of a home invasion during a no-knock SWAT raid, and attempted to defend herself. She was shot dead. Singleton was 80. Johnston was 92.
A black man hangs some ropes in an Oakland public park to be used as exercise equipment. The ropes raise legitimate concerns that someone is hanging “nooses” to intimidate blacks, so an investigation is ordered. That, of course is fine. But once the black man who rigged up the exercise equipment explains the situation, the investigation is over, right?
Here is the latest sermon from Prairie Chapel church in Lyons, Indiana.
You can watch it on Facebook or on YouTube.
One of the most common accusations we see online (on social media now, and on forums and blogs before that) is hypocrisy. Often, that accusation is true and necessary. In some cases, though, there is no “hypocrisy” and the accusation of “hypocrisy” is a smoke screen to hide from inconvenient facts or uncomfortable arguments. We need to develop the judgment needed to separate this from real hypocrisy.
Real hypocrisy is when someone excuses behavior that violates the standards or principles he has previously advocated – behavior by himself or by a public figure he is defending.
But often the best person to tell you not to do something is the person who has done it and regrets it now. When someone warns others away from a bad behavior he has abandoned, that is not hypocrisy. That is someone who has learned a lesson and cares enough to try to keep others from making the same mistake and suffering the same consequences. What is the harm in listening to that wisdom?
Comments are currently closed here, but as a reminder all posts are shared on Facebook and comments are open there. You can also respond to anything on this blog by submitting a visitor post on the page.
Unless you have been banned from the page, of course. You know who you are.
We keep hearing that it is not enough for white people to not be racist. Because of institutionalized white supremacy, whites must be actively anti-racist, or they are enabling a racist system. But if you try to be “anti-racist” and you do it the wrong way, you will be have your life and career ruined two years later.
This is why the “woke” cult is so toxic. There is never any forgiveness. There is no allowance for good intentions. Even if you try to follow the cult’s demands, you can be canceled for imperfect obedience. In this case, a woman wore a business suit and blackface to a Halloween party to mock Megyn Kelly, who had recently outraged Leftists for the way she spoke about blackface.
Rick Wilson, a prominent Republican strategist committed to the “Never Trump” movement, showed last week what it looks like to be totally consumed with bitterness and hatred. This could be brushed aside as one person’s foolishness, but it is part of a much bigger problem. When people act this way, how can we survive as a country? How do we have any hope of being unified or even living as neighbors?
Something struck me as I was reading II John last week, when I got to verse 12:
Having many things to write unto you, I would not write with paper and ink: but I trust to come unto you, and speak face to face, that our joy may be full.
John knows that face-to-face is better than impersonal methods of communication. So much of our life today is impersonal communication: Electronic mail, texting, and social media. But while those things have certainly had a positive impact in many ways – especially allowing us to stay in contact with family and friends who live far away – they cannot replace the intimacy that comes from talking to someone in person.